<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nakivo Backup and Replication Hot Add &#8211; speed up the backup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.itsmdaily.com/nakivo-backup-replication-hot-add-speed-backup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.itsmdaily.com/nakivo-backup-replication-hot-add-speed-backup/</link>
	<description>Product news, reviews and know how for IT Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:07:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cyberpaul		</title>
		<link>https://www.itsmdaily.com/nakivo-backup-replication-hot-add-speed-backup/#comment-151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cyberpaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.itsmdaily.com/?p=6179#comment-151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting approach. I&#039;ve seen it with Acronis before, even though I think it required a transporter VM in every single cluster, not datacenter. With more clusters, it became quite annoying :-)

However I don&#039;t see any performance gain compared to SAN transport. We use that in conjunction with VMcom Backup and the performance seems really good.

Great article though!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting approach. I&#8217;ve seen it with Acronis before, even though I think it required a transporter VM in every single cluster, not datacenter. With more clusters, it became quite annoying 🙂</p>
<p>However I don&#8217;t see any performance gain compared to SAN transport. We use that in conjunction with VMcom Backup and the performance seems really good.</p>
<p>Great article though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
